Systematic Desensitization vs. Flooding Therapy

Feeling fearful and anxious is often paralyzing. This is why people are ready to go to any length to avoid triggers like dogs, heights, spiders, closed spaces, or anything else. If you are also doing similar things and triggers disrupt your life, you should pay attention to them and take a concrete step. Different therapies have been proposed to deal with such situations.

Systematic desensitization and flooding, which are part of exposure therapy, are popular as they help overcome the challenges individuals face, making them fearful and anxious. These therapies aim to minimize the intensity of fear, phobias, and anxieties. This is why most people confuse them and consider them the same. However, they differ, and this article explains how and which is the right fit in different situations.

What is Systematic Desensitization?

Developed in the 1950s by Joseph Wolpe, systematic desensitization is a therapeutic technique. It works on the principles of behavioral therapy and helps individuals deal with their fear. In this technique, therapists, working on the principles of classical conditioning, gradually expose individuals to the triggering object or situation they fear.

Over time, they get comfortable with this exposure and feel relaxed when confronted with the feared object. Also, the client can pause the method when they feel overwhelmed.

How Does Systematic Desensitization Work in Therapy?

There are three phases in which the process of systematic desensitization takes place. These are:

1. Relaxation Training: Techniques, such as deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, or visualization, are taught to the individual to help them feel relaxed and stay calm during exposure.

2. Anxiety Hierarchy: By creating a hierarchy of fears, i.e. (starting from the least and working up to the most fearful), the therapist allows the client to face the fear and manage the situation gradually.

3. Gradual Exposure: The client is slowly exposed to the fear stimuli and made comfortable through visualization. Once the individual gets comfortable with the least feared thing, they move up the hierarchy, encountering the most anxiety-provoking situation.

For example, a person with acrophobia (fear of heights) is made to visualize standing on a balcony a few floors up. Once they get comfortable with this height, they are slowly made to stand on a real balcony, eventually moving to higher and more challenging environments.

What is Flooding?

On the other hand, Flooding is a direct and bold approach. Here, there is no gradual buildup like in system desensitization. In fact, in flooding, the person is exposed to fear, which provokes anxiety, eventually making the person habitual to the stimulus to develop an understanding and realize that no actual harm occurs when the stimulus is present.

It is quicker and can be effective. However, it can also be very distressing because of the intensity of the exposure. Furthermore, it often involves minimal therapist assistance during the exposure, as the emphasis is on self-confrontation.

How do both Therapies – Systematic Desensitization and Flooding Differ?

Which Is the Right Approach?

Selecting between the therapies depends on the types, individual preferences, diagnosis, and severity of phobia. If the client wants a quick solution and is ready to be exposed, flooding works. However, if the client is too frightened, then demonetization works.

Is Systematic Desensitization better than Flooding?

Because of several factors, systematic desensitization is often considered better than flooding. Here are several key advantages:

Gradual Exposure: As systematic desensitization is a structured approach, the client gets time to get used to the feared object or situation, and the chances of getting overwhelmed are less. Also, the gradual progression allows individuals to get accustomed to increasing anxiety levels, and it helps those distressed when exposed intensely to the situation or object.

Increased Comfort and Control: Individuals can control systematic desensitization because it is up to them to visualize the extent. If they get overwhelmed, they can stop the exposure.

Reduced Distress: Compared to flooding, the distress experienced in systematic desensitization is limited. Systematic desensitization is preferred for those who may find intense exposure overwhelming.

Low Drop-Out Rates: As the exposure is gradual in system desensitization and the individual has control, the person feels comfortable and goes with the therapy without backing out. It means the individual will complete the therapy, leading to a higher likelihood of success in overcoming the phobia.

Application: Systematic desensitization is effective for complex phobias or situations where a hierarchy of feared stimuli can be established. It is often viewed as ethical as an individual has control aligning with principles of informed consent and respect for the individual’s autonomy.

Maintenance: Systematic desensitization provides individuals with coping skills and relaxation techniques that help individuals manage anxiety in the long term. It helps them build a foundation for facing their fears outside therapy sessions.

Pros and Cons of Systematic Desensitization.

Systematic desensitization is widely used in exposure therapy. However, each technique has its advantages and disadvantages. Here, we list them for better understanding.

Pros and Cons of Flooding.

Note—Flooding is beneficial, but not everyone is comfortable with this exposure method. Therefore, the decision to undergo flooding should be made in consultation with a qualified mental health professional.

Where is Flooding in Exposure Therapy Used?

Flooding therapy is an intense exposure therapy designed to treat anxiety disorders, phobias, and conditions like OCD. It exposes individuals to their biggest fears based on respondent conditioning and behavior therapy principles. This therapy aims to help individuals remove the undesired response to a feared situation or stimulus. People with specific phobias and anxiety disorders who need immediate relief undergo this therapy. It is beneficial for situations where immediate and intense exposure is warranted.

For example, if a person fears public speaking, they can deal with it or learn to handle it by confronting their speaking phobia. As they are made to speak in front of people, they will realize that their fears are created in their heads and that they are not being judged or ridiculed by others. Flooding can be a powerful tool for rapidly reducing anxiety and breaking the cycle of avoidance behavior.

However, the therapy must be conducted under the guidance of a trained mental health professional in a supportive environment where coping is provided, which helps individuals navigate the exposure.

When to Use Systematic Desensitization vs. Flooding

Systematic desensitization and flooding are two distinct approaches in exposure therapy. The choice between them depends on factors like the nature of the phobia, the individual’s preferences, and the guidance of a qualified therapist.

1. Nature of the Phobia:

Systematic Desensitization: The approach is suitable for those who struggle with phobias that can be addressed gradually. This involves exposing the individual to a hierarchy of feared stimuli, where the slightest anxiety trigger is given first, then slowly progressing to the extreme one.

Flooding is typically used for phobias that can be confronted abruptly and intensively. In this approach, immediate and intense exposure to the feared object or situation is faced. This approach can be effective for certain phobias without requiring a step-by-step exposure hierarchy.

2. Patient’s Preferences and Comfort Levels:

Systematic Desensitization: Individuals who feel comfortable with slow exposure to the trigger in a controlled environment usually like it. This gives them the freedom to move at their own pace and feel confident.

Flooding: For individuals ready and willing to confront their fears head-on, flooding can be a quicker path to desensitization. It requires a higher level of readiness to face intense anxiety in a shorter period.

3. Ethical Considerations:

Systematic desensitization is ethical, as clients’ needs are considered, and they are gradually exposed to fear-generating scenarios or things. They can also pause the process when they get distressed. Contrary to this, flooding is emotionally overwhelming, and participants usually get anxious. Also, this process requires constant and careful monitoring by the therapist.

5. Time Constraints:

Systematic Desensitization: This approach may be more suitable for individuals with time constraints or who prefer a more gradual and manageable exposure schedule.

Flooding: It can be a more time-efficient option for individuals ready and willing to confront their fears intensely and directly.

Type of Phobia:

Specific Phobias: When an individual is struggling with a specific phobia, systematic desensitization is the preferred method, as gradual exposure can establish a hierarchy, which will help deal with it.

Situational or Complex Phobias: Flooding may be considered for more complex phobias or situations where immediate exposure is feasible and appropriate.

The choice between both therapies cannot be made by the individual. For this, proper consultation with a qualified therapist is required, as they can assess the specific phobia and individual needs and decide which therapy will work best. Both have advantages and disadvantages and are effective when applied in the proper contexts.

Takeaway: Overcoming Fear for a Fearless Future

Systematic desensitization and flooding help with fears and anxieties. However, therapists can only decide which one to use after a proper individual assessment. Once that is done, it becomes easy to start the process, and professionals can help you make the right choice. It is the first step towards getting better and understanding how to deal with your fears and anxieties.